Recent Postsrss

Ten (Research-Tested) New Year’s Resolutions

Ten (Research-Tested) New Year’s Resolutions

BUFFALO, N.Y. -- Need help choosing a New Year’s resolution? Research from the University at Buffalo can provide some direction. Below is a summary of useful health and wellness tips assembled from studies published by UB researchers in 2010.

Have a happy, healthy and safe new year. 

 
1.     Take care of a loved one and boost your own well being. Research by UB assistant professor of psychology Michael J. Poulin shows that helping sick family members can reduce stress and anxiety.
 
2.     Losing a few pounds may help you survive a car crash. Research by UB’s Dietrich V. Jehle, M.D. and professor of emergency medicine, found that moderately obese drivers are more likely to die in a severe car crash. 
 
3.     Hit the sack early. UB researcher Lisa B. Rafalson found that seven hours of sleep may decrease the risk of developing diabetes.
 
4.     Keep kids involved with friends to prevent overeating. Research by UB’s Sarah-Jeanne Salvy, associate professor of pediatrics, shows that childhood friendships can be a substitute for food and therefore can help stem obesity in children.
 
5.     Don’t give up hope when the going gets tough. Research by UB’s Mark D. Seery, assistant professor of psychology, found that adverse life experiences appear to make us more resilient and adaptable to stress.
 
6.     Talk to your kids about current events. Research by UB’s Ming M. Chiu, professor of learning and instruction, found that children who discuss current events with their parents develop better math and reasoning skills.  
 
7.     Jack-up your consumption of soy. Research by UB’s Anne M. Weaver and co-researchers at Roswell Park Cancer Institute shows that soy products are associated with a reduced risk of developing invasive breast tumors. 
 
8.     Encourage your kids to walk to school. Research by UB’s James N. Roemmich, associate professor of pediatrics, shows that a simple morning walk could help curb stress-related spikes in heart rate and blood pressure in children, potentially reducing their risk of heart disease later in life.
 
9.     Pay with cash at the grocery store to avoid junk food. Research by UB’s Satheeshkumar Seenivasan found that people who bought groceries with credit and debit cards were more likely to load up on unhealthy foods. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101018174345.htm
 
10. Have a few drinks to boost romance. Drinking in moderation with your spouse or partner can increase intimacy, according to research by Ashley Levitt of UB’s Research Institute on Addictions. 

 

No back-seat bullets this Thanksgiving!

expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

Dr. Dietrich Jehle

UB professor of Emergency Medicine

Erie County Medical Center

Expert in auto injuries, and behaviors that increase their probability

phone: 716-898-4431

cell: 716-472-4094

email: jehle@buffalo.edu

 

Avoid a "back-seat bullet."

Stay with the traffic flow on innerstates and highways.

If you are driving a "high-profile" vehicle, be careful on curves.

These are some safe driving tips based on a series of studies on transportation patterns funded by the Center for Transportation Injury Research, conducted by Dr. Jehle.

"The Thanksgiving holiday is one of the busiest times on roadways, and distracted and drowsy driving, always a danger,  are even more of an issue when there is more traffic on the roads," says Jehle.

Important safety tips:

"When there is a lot of food in your stomach, like after Thanksgiving dinner, more of your blood flow is directed to your stomach and less to your brain.  As a result, you feel tired and drowsy following a large meal. This is particularly an issue when traveling longer distances over the holidays.  And there is more alcohol consumption involved, particular the day before and after Thanksgiving when college kids return for the holidays.

"Driving much slower than the rest of the traffic is more dangerous that going slightly above the speed limit. Variance in speed is an important factor in traffic accidents. 

"Buckling the seat belt is crucial -  including every passenger. The odds of death are 2.6 times greater for an unbelted driver, and an unbelted back seat passenger is a potential "back seat bullet." An unbelted back seat passenger increases the odds of killing a person in the front seat in a head-on crash by 2.3 times.

"Be careful about speed when driving on a curve, especially if you drive a "taller" vehicle that may be more likely to roll over.  Roll-over crashes are responsible for approximately 30 % of fatalities, and seat belts are particularly important in preventing deaths in such crashes. 

"Drive carefully, and have a safe Thanksgiving!"

Challenge to Full Body Scan Will Be Tough

expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

R. Nils Olsen Jr.

Professor

University at Buffalo Law School

716-645-3193

nolsen@buffalo.edu

R. Nils Olsen, Jr., professor in the UB Law School specializes in federal post-conviction remedies and environmental policy.

With regard to anyone challenging the new full body scan used at airports, he says, "More than likely, federal authorities have the ability to require reasonable security. Short of suing to get it declared illegal, it is a condition of using this transportation mode."

"As long as there is a compelling justification for these searches, which there probably is -- having recently flown on an international airline -- and the means of employing those searches are the least intrusive while still effective," Olsen says,  "I'd be surprised if it would ultimately run into any fourth amendment or legal infirmities.  I don't see any challenge being successful."

UB Political Scientists on 2010 National Election Results and Who Will Control of the New York State Senate

expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

Joshua Dyck, PhD

Assistant Professor of Political Science

University at Buffalo

(716) 645-8435

jdyck@buffalo.edu

 

Josh Dyck conducts research and publishes on  American electoral politics, how citizens interact with the institutional and social environment, and in particular, ballot initiatives and direct democracy.

"For the most part, the election proceeded as expected, both nationally and on the state and local levels," Dyck says.

"Nationally, Republicans outperformed expectations in the House and underperformed expectations in the Senate. Voter discontent was very high, but there was no clear policy message behind that discontent.

"Republicans won the House in the biggest turnover in over 60 years. Yet, it will difficult for them to enact their policy agenda and force showdowns with President Obama with the Senate still in the hands of the Democrats.
 
"Many Tea Party candidates did well, but there may also have been some
overreach in many states, as conservative candidates in New York, California, Delaware and Nevada were not able to win races that were in play.
 
"In the New York state legislature, the Senate still hangs in the balance. This is very important because if the Democrats are able to hold the Senate, they will be able to redraw the state lines
 
"Statewide press coverage of the state senate is not good right now, so let me offer a little more analysis.
 
"New York's upper house is apportioned in a way that currently strongly favors Republican control; If the Democrats win the Senate, they would be able to redraw lines to create a more stable Democratic majority in both New York state legislative houses. 
 
"In this regard, a great deal is riding on the yet-to-be-counted absentee ballots in the 60th Senate District currently held by Antoine Thompson," Dyck says, "but his is not the only Democratic seat that could go to a Republican.
 
"By my calculations, the current decided state of the NYS Senate is 29-D and 30-R. There are three  races that are complete toss-ups which are all currently held by Democrats:  those of Craig Johnson in the 7th, Suzi Oppenheimer in the 37th and Antoine Thompson in the 60th
 
With current returns, Johnson is trailing, and Oppenheimer and Thompson
are leading (all by only 100-200 votes). These  three races will decide
the fate of the New York State Senate and future state apportionment.".
 
expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

James E. Campbell, Ph.D.

Professor and Chair of Political Science

University at Buffalo

716-645-8452

jcampbel@buffalo.edu

Jim Campbell is a nationally recognized and widely published political scientist who specializes in American electoral politics and forecasting. In papers presented before Labor Day in Buffalo and at the American Political Science Association Convention in Washington, DC, Campbell's  forecasting models predicted a Republican congressional seat gain higher than that of any political forecaster, and predicted that the 2010 midterm congressional election would be a massive victory for the Republican Party.

He says, "The 2010 midterm congressional election was an enormous victory for the Republican Party. Voters elected 239 Republicans to the House (with 13 seats undecided), reinstating the Republican majority lost in 2006. "The Tea Party did not fare so well, however, and it would be a mistake to interpret the election as a massive rejection of the Obama presidency."This is the largest Republican majority in the House since 1946. After the 1946 midterm, Republicans held 246 seats. The maximum that Republicans held since then was 232 seats after the 2004 election. "The election also produced the largest seat change in the U.S. House of Representatives in more than sixty years. Republicans gained at least 61 seats over their 2008 level. This surpassed the 54 seat gain that Republicans registered in the landmark 1994 “Contract With America” midterm election. "Republicans also gained at least six Senate seats (with two seats still undecided), bringing them within a few seats of regaining control of the Senate in 2012.

"The huge seat gains by the Republicans were basically in keeping with the prediction of my forecasting models presented in August at the American Political Items Collectors Convention held in Buffalo, and later at the American Political Science Association Convention in Washington, D.C. before Labor Day. "The model predicted in August that Republicans would likely gain about 51 or 52 seats, plus or minus an average of about 6 seats. The forecast put seat change at the outer limit of seat change in the last half century. "It was the highest forecast of Republican seat change of any published forecast made in August or September. "Though Republican gains in the House are somewhat higher than those expected by my forecast model, they are within the range of reasonable error–given the array of candidate campaigning effects and local conditions that affect congressional elections as well as the uncharted territory of such large gains. "The details of the models were published in an article entitled “The Seats in Trouble Forecast of the 2010 Elections to the U.S. House” in the October issue of  PS: Political Science & Politics.

"There are two major reasons for the huge Republican gains this year. One is that they suffered significant losses the previous two elections. The back-to-back losses in 2006 and 2008 placed a large number of Democrats in Congressional seats otherwise predisposed to vote Republican. "For instance, 47 Democrats held seats in districts carried by President Bush in 2004 and Senator McCain in 2008. Many were ripe to be taken back by Republicans. 

"Republican gains can also be interpreted, in part, as a repudiation of the first two years of the Obama administration on both performance and values grounds. "American voters registered their frustrations with a struggling, sputtering economy. While they realize that President Obama inherited an economy in crisis, they expected more progress after two years than they see. "Voters had little patience with month after month of unemployment rates around 10 percent. "They also registered their objections to the Democrats’ national health care plan and the Obama administration’s $800 billion stimulus plan. President Obama and the Democrats were elected in 2008 to fix the economy and voters declared on Tuesday that this mandate was unfulfilled and misused. 

"Although the election could easily be interpreted as simply a massive rejection of the  Obama presidency, this would be a mistake. "President Obama’s approval rating in the mid-40s is not great, but neither is it especially weak. The correction from 2006 and 2008 (much like a stock market correction of stocks driven up by short-term conditions) is a big part of the 2010 story.

"While the Republican Party had a great election, Tea Party supporters in the party did not fare so well. "Tea Party backed candidates won in Kentucky and Florida Senate races, but suffered high-profile Senate losses in Delaware, Nevada, and Alaska (and possibly Colorado). "Both Delaware and Nevada were considered nearly sure wins, had the Republican candidates been mainstream. The Alaska Senate seat was saved by a write-in campaign by the incumbent Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski, who had been defeated in her primary by the Tea Party candidate Joe Miller.

Justice Department decision supports DNA as falling outside patents

expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

Mark Bartholomew

Associate Professor

University at Buffalo Law School

716-645-5959

bartholo@buffalo.edu

The legal recommendation by the Justice Department to exclude human and other genes from patent eligibility suggests that the tide may be turning in determining whether patents should be granted for isolating gene sequences, according to Bartholomew, an expert on intellectual property law.

 "The federal government's position," he says, "follows on the heels of a district court decision holding, for the first time, that DNA is merely a sequence found in nature and, hence, unpatentable subject matter."

 "The district court decision is going up on appeal so this argument is far from over," Batholomew says. "For years, the biotech industry has proceeded on the assumption that isolated DNA is patentable.  Courts are usually loathe to disrupt the settled expectations of investors and businesses.  Moreover, in recent years, the Supreme Court has demonstrated an increasing willingness to decide patent cases. 

 

"My guess is that before too long the Supreme Court will weigh in directly on the patentability of DNA."

 

More details on the federal government's stance and the possible impact on the medical and biotechnology industry can be found in this New York Times article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/30/business/30drug.html?scp=2&sq=andrew%20pollack&st=cse

 

Related Topics:

Department of Justice, DNA, Genes, patents

University at Buffalo expert praises federal government’s anti-bullying initiative

expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

Janice DeLucia-Waack

Associate professor, Department of Counseling, School and Educational Psychology

Graduate School of Education

716-645-1107

jdelucia@buffalo.edu

The Department of Education’s recent nationwide letter urging educators to combat bullying in their schools is a strong and significant message that this abusive behavior will no longer be tolerated, according to a University at Buffalo education professor instrumental in the university’s new center to prevent bullying and school violence.

 

“This letter indicates that the Department of Education is directing schools to clearly and significantly address the issues of bullying and student harassment,” says Janice DeLucia-Waack, associate professor in Department of Counseling School and Educational Psychology and a member of the search committee for the director of UB’s Jean M. Alberti Center for the Prevention of Bullying, Abuse and School Violence.

 

“What makes most sense is establishing a clear code of conduct that states positive respectful behavior is expected, and also outlines what is bullying and harassment – as well as stating clear consequences for those behaviors.”

 

The letter, sent to schools, colleges and universities throughout the country  – all addressed “Dear Colleague” – outlines legal obligations to protect students from various forms of harassment. The letter also provides examples of harassment and illustrates how a school should respond in each case.

 

At the same time, President Obama announced the next steps to address bullying and harassment in schools and scheduled a conference for early next year to raise awareness of the tools available to prevent it. In New York State, Gov. Paterson Sept. 8 signed a comprehensive anti-bullying bill called the Dignity for All Students Act.

 

DeLucia-Waack says it is not clear there is a dramatic increase in bullying and student harassment. However, the use of technology, as in the case of the Rutgers student who committed suicide after he was harassed on the Internet, shows technology is a factor in bullying that was not present years ago.

 

DeLucia-Waack also said all school personnel needed to have specific anti-bullying training, including those who supervise hallways, buses and the cafeteria where incidents often occur. This training needs to include what bullying is and how to intervene appropriately.

 

“Based on the Response to Intervention model developed by the Department Of Education  Education (and mandated to be implemented in NYS schools by 20112), classroom guidance to teach appropriate social skills must be provided to all students,” she says. “And then individual and small group interventions must also be utilized for those students who are bullied or are bullies to remediate the problems.  

 

“Proactive education to help all students develop empathy, respect and social skills is the key to prevention and effective remediation of bullying.”

 

Celebrities in Space: Recent lawsuit highlights the balance between a celebrity’s ‘right of publicity’ and freedom of communication

expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

Mark Bartholomew

Associate Professor

University at Buffalo Law School

716-645-5959

bartholo@buffalo.edu

 

A recent lawsuit filed by astronaut Bruce McCandless against the singer Dido and her record label illustrates the tension between protecting a celebrity’s image and allowing free expression, says Mark Bartholomew, an assistant professor at UB’s Law School. In the suit, McCandless contends that Dido’s use of a photo of the earth also containing an image of McCandless in a spacesuit violated his “right of publicity.”

Bartholomew, an expert on intellectual property law, interprets the real-world implications for all of us in the growing number of lawsuits designed to stop use of celebrity images.

 “In 2010, we live in a world where celebrities are in more and more demand for their ability to attract consumer attention,” says Bartholomew. “Whenever a celebrity wins one of these cases, another party is blocked from its preferred choice in communicating with others.

 “McCandless contends that Dido’s choice to use a NASA photograph -- taken from the Space Shuttle in 1984 -- on her latest album cover violated his ‘right of publicity,’ "  The right of publicity, Bartholomew says, is a legal right that allows a celebrity to sue to prevent unauthorized uses of his identity.

“Although the right of publicity has been around, in some form, since the 1950s, this lawsuit may be an example of how recent interpretations of that right have gone too far,” says Bartholomew.

“The photo used on the Dido album shows the earth from space.  In the photo, the earth looks immense, and McCandless looks extremely small and fragile, hovering above the earth in his space suit.  Because the image of McCandless in the NASA photo is so small and his face is obscured by his helmet, no distinguishing feature of McCandless is visible on the album cover.”

Still, Bartholomew says, McCandless may have a case.

“He argues that the NASA photo at issue is so famous, and his presence in that photo is so well-known, that people know that it’s him on the album cover,” says Bartholomew. 

“Courts were once careful to limit to the right of publicity to appropriations of one’s name, facial features or actual voice. But recent cases have allowed celebrities to sue when advertisers used much more tangential aspects of celebrity identity, like a distinctive pitching stance or a particular mode of dress.” 

 

New WHI findings surprising, UB primary author says

expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

Jean Wactawski-Wende, PhD, co-PI, UB WHI Vangard Center and

PI, new $8.2 million WHI funding

Professor and assoc. chair of Department of Social and Preventive Medicine

Adjunct professor of Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics

University at Buffalo

716-829-5374

jww@buffalo.edu

Jean Wactawski-Wende, PhD., a primary author on the newest study from the WHI published today in JAMA, says the findings showing an increased risk of more advanced breast cancer and an increased risk of death in women on hormone therapy were unexpected.

These findings related to increased mortality in estrogen plus progestin users were surprising,” says Wactawski-Wende. “Prior studies had suggested that, although these women were diagnosed with breast cancer, their prognosis was more positive than those who were not on hormone therapy when diagnosed.

"This report shows that the opposite is true. Combined hormone therapy leads to breast cancers being diagnosed at a more advanced stage, causes more breast cancer related deaths and more deaths from all causes in these women.  The results also findicate that hormone therapy interferes with detection of breast cancer due to increased breast density.

"This study emphasizes the importance of clinical trial data to understand the risks and benefits of taking hormone therapy," says Wactawski-Wende.

 

Related Topics:

breast cancer, hormone therapy

Chilean miners' group support diminishes potential PTSD

expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

John Violanti, PhD

Professor, Social and Preventive Medicine

PTSD specialist

Phone: 716-829-

Violanti@buffalo.edu

John Violanti, PhD., expert in PTSD, says the risk of PTSD in the Chilean miners probably is a lot lower than being in combat because of the high degree of social support, not only among the group down in the mine, but also from their family and friends above.

Most research shows that support is the biggest factor that can ameliorate PTSD. 

Violanti, a military veteran and former member of the New York State Police, studies the effect of stress in persons working in dangerous professions, such as police, firefighters, and those in the military.

Related Topics:

Chilean miners, PTSD, social support

Chilean Geologist Says Global Mining Industry Will Never be the Same

expert photo
EXPERT CONTACT :

Dr. Joaquin Cortes

Visiting Assistant Professor of Geology

University at Buffalo College of Arts and Sciences

716-645-4605

caco@buffalo.edu

 

Note to news media: A videotaped interview with Cortés is available at  http://bit.ly/9JbjMP
 
BUFFALO, N.Y. -- Joaquin Cortés, PhD, a visiting assistant professor of geology at the University at Buffalo, a Chilean native and former staff member of the Chilean Geological Survey (Sernageomin) says that the San Jose mine disaster will alter, dramatically and forever, small mining operations throughout the world.
“The global mining industry will never be the same after this,” says Cortés, who worked in Chile’s Los Sauces copper mine early in his career as a mapping geologist and then worked as a staff geologist in the Chilean Geological Survey (Servicio Nacional de Geologia y Mineria; Sernageomin), which oversees mine inspections.  
“Knowing the operating conditions of small copper and gold enterprises in Chile and, in particular, those that have been active for more than a hundred years, the miners were incredibly lucky throughout this whole ordeal,” he says.
“Nevertheless, the disaster has put a major focus on safety in these small mining companies, not just in Chile, but throughout the world. Situations like this more often end in tragedy, such as the recent examples in China and West Virginia.”
Cortés says that there are more than 800 mines in the Copiapó region alone and several thousand throughout the country, some of which are so large that they are like underground cities, complete with roads, traffic lights, hospitals and restaurants.
With its current level of resources, he says Chile is not able to perform sufficient inspections on its mines.
“This whole event is going to result in fundamental changes for operations in Chile’s small mining enterprises, and possibly for those in other parts of the world as well,” he says.
Right after the San Jose mine collapsed, Cortés says, the Chilean president fired several top officials at the Chilean Geological Survey.
“I think he will be making more dramatic changes in the legislation regarding safety in small enterprises, which will probably improve the rights and working conditions of the miners,” Cortés says. “It is likely that such changes will be an example followed by other countries in the world.
“Chile is a resilient country with an important mining culture,” Cortés concludes. “We have appropriate technologies and expertise. That is why this story, and a rescue operation unlike any that has been performed in the industry before, finished with a happy ending.”
Login