Recent Postsrss
-
10/29/2012
-
06/28/2012
-
05/29/2012
-
05/22/2012
-
05/10/2012
UB News Video
Contact Information
- John DellaContrada
- Email:dellacon@buffalo.edu
- Office: 716-645-4601
- Cell: 716-361-3006
- Website:www.buffalo.edu/news
Gay Marriage -- NC is Wrong Again and the President is Right!
|
EXPERT CONTACT :
Jonathan Katz, PhD Department of Visual Studies University at Buffalo 646-241-5241
|
Consistently, polls have shown an ever increasing percentage of Americans, especially younger Americans, are in favor of marriage equality for gay men and women.
That North Carolina elected to be on the wrong side of history once again is, sadly, a habit it needs to break. North Carolinians opposed civil rights for African Americans; they elected Jess Helms and kept putting him in office despite his hateful rhetoric against blacks and gays.
A governor of North Carolina will, in the not too distant future, have to hold a press conference to apologize for this vote. The habit to disenfranchise others runs deep there and has for centuries, and despite constitutional guarantees of equality, the state's voters continue to pick and choose who will be made "equal."
The President's statement in favor of marriage equality is a game changer. Active support for him among the left was at best lukewarm and this statement will revitalize the progressive movement at large; it's import goes far beyond the queer community, because he's finally shown some of that fighting spirit and principled commitment that made him a favorite during his campaign.
Obama's statement, then, is an olive branch to the left. And he needs us to win again, not just our votes, but our fervor, our door-to-door politicking, our grassroots savvy. We always knew he believed in marriage equality, but we weren't sure on which side his politicalcalculus would come down. It's great to see he's come out in favor of full equality.
Obama's Gay Marriage Position is a "Shrewd Political Move," says Dyck
|
EXPERT CONTACT :
Joshua Dyck, PhD Associate Professor of Political Science University at Buffalo (716) 645-8435 |
President Barack Obama's "evolving" position on gay marriage should be understood as a shrewd political move that carries a considerable, but calculated, risk.
The proceeding months will unveil how it pans out, but right now, President Obama and the Democrats are entering uncharted campaign territory.
Over the last 30 years, Republicans have used their positions on social issues to galvanize the electorate and mobilize their base. Obama's support for marriage equality signals that the President intends to make the 2012 campaign about more than the economy -- he intends to take the fight to the Republican party on the social issue front.
So far we have seen the Obama campaign characterize Romney and the Republicans as anti-immigrant and anti-woman and his affirmation of his support for gay marriage demonstrates that the President plans to hold Republicans accountable for positions on this issue as well.
With modest economic growth and some warning signals from the economy, the political environment in 2012 is, and will continue to be, extremely competitive.
In a close election, mobilization of core supporters becomes critical. While the President's evolving position on gay marriage has the potential to help conservatives mobilize voters, this move is clearly aimed at mobilizing many on the left who may feel less excited by Obama's promises of hope and change in 2012 than they were in 2008.
It may be too early to predict much, but if Obama produces a $1 billion war chest, it will be difficult for Republicans to unseat him
James Campbell, PhD, professor and chair of the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo, and Joshua Dyck, PhD, assistant professor of political science at UB are both experts in electoral politics.
Here they comment on why President Obama has begun fundraising for the 2012 campaign so early, predictions that his efforts will break all records, why he will HAVE to raise so much money, the broken public financing system, Republican eletoral disarray, the recent rebuke of the Democrats and what all this tells us about the upcoming presidential election.
|
EXPERT CONTACT :
James E. Campbell, PhD Professor and Chair Department of Political Science 716-645-8452 jcampbel@buffalo.edu
|
"First, the campaign finance system established in the wake of Watergate in the 1970s has disintegrated. A great deal of attention was focused on the Supreme Court ruling in the "Citizens United" case about independent expenditures a couple of years ago, but the real story has been presidential candidates opting out of the public financing system in the last few elections. The presidential public financing system is broken and so President Obama, as a candidate, will be out raising private campaign contributions. And yes, some speculate that he may raise and spend up to a billion dollars on his reelection.
"Second, President Obama may need to raise unprecedented campaign funds because he will likely be in for a tough race. Incumbent presidents normally have an advantage in elections, but President Obama may face greater opposition than most.
|
EXPERT CONTACT :
Joshua Dyck, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Political Science 716-645-8435 jdyck@buffalo.edu
|
"In 2008, President Obama changed the way campaigns were run when he raised enough money from small donors over the internet to smash all previous fundraising records," Dyck recalls.
"Based on his grassroots support and presence as an incumbent, I expect that he will once again raise an incredible amount of money, making it a formidable task for his Republican opponent to unseat him.
"However, as Donald Trump will prove this year if he decides to run for President, money will only take you so far. While the official campaign was announced today, it's far too early to start talking about re-election prospects," he says.
2012 election, campaign fundraising, Obama campaign, public financing of elections